AgeBridge Guided Project Reference build by AgeBridge

Proposal Drafter for Service Businesses

A drafter that turns a short intake into a scoped proposal: what is included, what is not, the assumptions it rests on, and the timeline. Prices come from the business's own rate card, never from the model.

AgeBridge built this as a worked example of the solution. No client results are claimed. Build your own version and it becomes proof on your profile.

Business problem

Agencies and consultants lose days writing proposals. Each one starts from the last document someone can find, and the scope, assumptions and exclusions are rewritten from memory every time.

Solution

A drafter that turns a short intake into a scoped proposal: what is included, what is not, the assumptions it rests on, and the timeline. Prices come from the business's own rate card, never from the model.

What was built

  • •Structured intake: goal, systems involved, deadline, decision maker
  • •Scope built from a library of reusable building blocks the business owns
  • •Assumptions and exclusions written explicitly on every proposal
  • •Rates pulled from the business's rate card, with gaps flagged for a human
  • •A draft in the company template, left unsent until a person approves it

Architecture / workflow

  1. 1Intake form or a call summary starts the draft
  2. 2Requirements are matched to reusable scope blocks
  3. 3The rate card supplies every number that appears in the document
  4. 4The model writes the narrative around those fixed parts
  5. 5The draft lands in Drive and the deal in the CRM, awaiting approval

Integrations

Google DriveHubSpot

Tools / stack

Clauden8nGoogle Sheets

Screenshots

Screenshot slot
Screenshot slot

Demo

No demo added yet. Builders can attach a short video.

Results

No verified results shared. AgeBridge only displays real, builder-reported outcomes.

Evidence

  • Architecture notes · Scope blocks, rate card and approval stepHow data flows and why you designed it that way.

Proof

Proof score

10/100

Add demo video — 60 seconds showing the thing actually running. The single strongest proof.

Not reviewed yet. Evidence is shown exactly as the builder attached it.

Decisions and tradeoffs

  • •The model never invents a price. A missing rate is raised as a question, not filled in.
  • •Every proposal states its assumptions, because that is what protects the scope later.
  • •Nothing is sent automatically.

What went wrong

Nothing notable was reported.

What I'd do next

Learning which scope blocks are cut most often during negotiation.

Need something like this?

Talk to the builder behind the project, or build your own version.